Skip to main navigation Skip to main content

This site uses cookies

We use cookies and other tracking technologies to improve your browsing experience on our website.
  • Home
  • Projects
  • Summary of a review of grapevine germplasm collections in Australia
Back
Contemporary

Summary of a review of grapevine germplasm collections in Australia

This page contains information about our current research projects and programs, reports from our completed projects, and tells you how to access our funding and report back to us if you are funded. Browse the listing or search for particular topics.

GWR 1112 final report
Download
PDF 896.6KB

Overview

The report reviewed and updated Australia's national grapevine germplasm register, finding around 900 varieties and clones held across 16 collections, with considerable duplication, inconsistent naming and limited DNA-based identity verification (under 7% of accessions tested). Australia's two largest collections, CSIRO and SARDI, were closed to industry at the time, despite being ranked, alongside AVIA and RVIC, as best placed to meet future industry priorities. It compares funding models, health-testing standards and access practices at international grapevine collections in Germany, France, Portugal and the USA, and at other Australian perennial industries including citrus, almonds, pome fruit and forestry, most of which carry stronger government funding and additional income streams. The report recommends rationalising Australia's collections, and pursuing a risk assessment, strategic plan and management board to guide future investment.

The nature of genetic resources in the form of in situ plantings nationally and internationally, is diverse. The nature of formal collections of plant material is usually an indication of the original purpose of collecting the plants and the value perceived in having the plants maintained in a specific location under particular conditions and operating plans. The project team was asked to conduct a review of Australia’s main grapevine collections. The Brief which is attached in Appendix 1, outlined four main tasks: • Review the status of existing grapevine collections. • Deliver information on ‘best practice’ management of genetic resources. • Make recommendations on priority collections. • Discuss potential business models. A revised and expanded register of grapevine germplasm was produced. To update the previous edition of the National Register (Nicholas, 2006), the team has collated confidential information received from public and private collection managers. It has also reviewed available information on other perennial (grape and non-grape) genetic collections in Australia and overseas. The functions and resources of these collections have been considered in identifying options for Australia and recommended approaches for Australia’s future management of grapevine genetic material.

Abstract

This review collates all available data in current Australian viticultural germplasm collections.

Member content

This content is restricted to wine exporters and levy payers.

Reports are also available for one-off purchase to non-members.

Click here to find out more.